The NCDRC has clarified an important legal principle in a medical negligence case from Maharashtra, holding that “no cure is not negligence” and that failure of treatment alone cannot be equated with medical negligence. In a case alleging post injection radial nerve palsy, the Commission found no proof of negligent treatment and dismissed the complaint against the doctor.
The Supreme Court is examining whether compensation for medical negligence can be recovered from a doctor’s estate through legal heirs after the doctor’s death, even when the complainant has also died. The case raises crucial questions about survivability of civil liability under consumer law and could reshape medical negligence jurisprudence in India.
The Uttarakhand State Consumer Commission held Max Super Speciality Hospital liable after a patient died following a Dobutamine Stress Echo test conducted without proven informed consent. This landmark 2025 judgment explains how lack of informed consent amounts to medical negligence and why hospitals are vicariously liable for doctors’ actions.
AIIMS New Delhi doctors have issued a serious warning against using AI tools like ChatGPT for medical diagnosis or treatment after a patient suffered severe internal bleeding by following chatbot generated advice for back pain. The case highlights the dangers of self medication, AI hallucinations, and why real medical consultation, tests, and clinical judgement cannot be replaced by algorithms.
A landmark NCDRC judgment has awarded ₹75 lakhs compensation in a medical negligence surgery case where a young patient lost her leg after a vascular procedure. This article explains the legal reasoning, failure of informed consent, surgical duty of care, and why the Commission held the doctors and hospital liable.
Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that without independent expert medical opinion, doctors cannot be prosecuted for medical negligence. In a major relief to the medical community, the court quashed the criminal case arising from a postpartum death, reaffirming that medical complications and treatment failure are not the same as criminal negligence.
Medical negligence case where a Foreign Medical Graduate doctor was held guilty for delayed diagnosis, misrepresentation of qualification and misuse of MD suffix, leading to a ruptured ectopic pregnancy and tubectomy. The consumer court awarded 20 lakh compensation for permanent reproductive harm and mental trauma to the patient.
